Seagate 5 Year Warranty: Not so Easy

After nearly twelve months in operation, my 300GB Seagate ST3300831A I purchased last December has finally failed. I am surprised, as it is operating in far better conditions, temperature wise, than my Western Digital disks.

In any event, I browsed to Seagate’s Web site to track down how to RMA the drive. Ought to be easy, right? One would think, especially in light of their five year warranty program.

First, you have to register for a My Seagate account. Then, you are forced to use either Internet Explorer or Netscape (no, Firefox will not work) to access the poorly documented RMA application. Once you gain access, you’re thrust into a strange application with no obvious indication of what to do.

When you’re asked to enter an order reference number, it’s not immediately clear you can make one up. Yes, it does not matter what number you use. If you use the online help it indicates after some scrolling that you can use, say, your telephone number, which I did. If it doesn’t matter, it ought to just pick one.

Next you find yourself completely lost on the product information screen, where you need to enter some, but not all, of the information. Specifically, you need to include your part number (or model number or your direct customer part number) and the serial number (or carton or pallet id). The only selectable RMA reason is field failure and thus it should not even be an option to select. Finally, you can enter the RMA information, but then as a second step, you must validate the information. Why entering the information and submitting it does not also validate is beyond me.

Seagate offers advanced replacement, but for the hefty sum of $24.95. For another $75 I could order a brand new drive from a different vendor, so I decided to decline (…the advanced replacement, not the RMA).

By contrast, when I replaced my failed Maxtor disk a few years ago, I simply ran MaxBlaster, it returned an error code associated with a failure code that would trigger a RMA on Maxtor’s Web site, and you simply entered the code, some basic information, and selected the expedited RMA option. Easy.

While it’s certainly nice Seagate offers a five year warranty with its disks, it certainly is a pain when you have to take advantage of their warranty program. Better, perhaps, than having to buy a new disk, but you’re still out shipping of the failed product back to Seagate, and an additional $24.95 if you actually want a replacement quickly. If it’s a disk you can’t live without, you may end up buying a new one anyway while waiting for Seagate to ship a replacement.

For the record, it’s interesting to note I have had two Maxtors (120GB 2MB/cache) in production for over a year. Within six months one of the Maxtors failed. Less than a year later, the out of warranty replacement failed. During that period I’ve had five Western Digital disks (four 120GB 8MB/cache, one 40GB 2MB/cache) and not a single one has failed. The thermal temperatures the Western Digital drives have experienced have been consistently a few degrees Celsius higher than the Maxtors. Meanwhile my two Seagate (300GB, 8MB/cache, PATA) have run even cooler, at around 36C, with a single failure in 11 months thus far. All anecdotal information, of course.

Update, March 19, 2009.

The Seagate process is no longer annoying. One of the 200GB Seagate 7200.7s I bought in January 2006 finally failed. It failed a long SMART test in January 2006, but kept running. It finally died and no longer appears when attached to an ATA controller.

I blew the $20 on the advanced RMA and had a new drive in two days. I ended up with a 7200.9 250GB refurb from China. Products from China do not encourage me. We’ll see how long this one lasts.

Oh — None of those WD drives have failed yet. I have the original 4 x 120GBs in service and they’re all still fine. Both 2×40GB WDs are running like champs. Also have an additional 3×80GB drives, one old, two from the past two years, all fine.

I hear horror stories about the Seagate 7200.11s. I don’t think I’ll be buying anymore.

3 Comments

  1. oldster
    Posted 12/4/2007 at 11:27 pm | Permalink

    well the amount on the credit card is not charged to your credit card if you return the old unit within 30 days of reciveing the old unit andconfermation that it is in fact a dead drive
    i have been useing seagate drives for around 30 years now and am extreamly happy yes i will agree that the rma form leaves a bit to be desired but it is a very good company as far as i am concerned and i love the five years i get rather than the shorter time with other brands and i have some drives that have run 15 years with out a problem except i seem to always need a bigger one before they die

  2. Patrick Ng
    Posted 7/17/2008 at 10:28 pm | Permalink

    I’m a Western Digital guy. I have return 2 WD drives without any problem (Canada). Each time, they sent me an advanced replacement, and I had 30 days to return the defective drive. WD pays for shipping to get the drive to me, and I pay for shipping to get the defective drive to them.

  3. Tom G
    Posted 2/7/2010 at 4:22 am | Permalink

    Patrick Ng, competition between these two companies is a healthy thing and it’s great for consumers. As these two battle to out-do one another, prices fall and the ante is increasingly upped, allowing prices to be set correctly by the economy.

    It’s also healthy for the progression of technological advances.

    It’s a good thing for a free market economy. It’s a bad thing when one company reaches a monopoly. Technology staggers and prices rise.

Post a Comment

Your email is never shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*